Important Judgments in matrimonial disputes
Roopenshu Pratap Singh, a supreme court lawyer conducted workshop on how to fight legal case. He provided various judgments and significance of each judgement in the past. We could use citations in our cases as per the scenario. These judgments are very useful for any decisions.
Below are major judgments are very useful to explore
Maintenance related
1. No maintenance to well qualified and capable wife
Smt. Mamta Jaiswal vs Rajesh Jaiswal on 24 March, 2000
Judgement: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1728023/
2. Wife couldn’t prove Domestic Violence
Sanjay Sudhakar Bhosale vs Khristina W/O Sanjay Bhosale on 8 April, 2008,
Bombay High court
Judgement: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/694295/
3. Standard of living of husband is much higher
Amit Khanna vs Priyanka Khanna & Ors. on 1 September, 2010
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/45082345/
4. No maintenance for arrogant wife
Deb Narayan Halder vs Smt. Anushree Halder on 26 August, 2003
Supreme Court of India
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1017614/
5. Wife is getting separate income
Bhagwan Dutt vs Kamla Devi And Anr on 17 October, 1974
Supreme Court of India
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/138019/
6. Wife can’t file for multiple maintenance through multiple laws
Gomaji vs Smt. Yashoda And Anr. on 13 September, 1995
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/861545/
7. Husband’s parent’s property can’t be counted
Smt. Sushila Devi vs Shri Joginder Kumar on 2 July, 2010
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/58872859/
8. Wife is working and has child. Both are bound to contribute for child
Padmja Sharma vs Ratan Lal Sharma on 28 March, 2000
Appeal (civil) 2462 of 1999
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1810824/
9. Wife mentioned husband earns more than what is actual
Kusum Sharma vs Mahinder Kumar Sharma on 29 May, 2017
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/58870586/
10. Well qualified and highly qualified wife should work for maintenance(Very good Judgement)
Delhi High Court in CM (M) 1153/2008 titled as Kavita Prasad Vs. Ram Ashray Prasad
https://www.kaanoon.com/76598/alimony-for-well-qualified-woman
http://saveyouself-doublestandard.blogspot.com/2015/03/judgemetns.html
This is one of the famous judgements and very good to read.
“The petitioner who is an MBBS qualified Doctor and admittedly had been in practice before, claims that she was sitting at home despite being a qualified Doctor and does not work. The petitioner claimed maintenance against her husband who is in service. The Trial Court granted maintenance of Rs.4,000/- per month. This petition is made against observation of the Trial Court that she was working somewhere and earning around Rs.8,000 to 10,000/- PM and that the maintenance granted by the Trial Court was made subject to adjustment of the maintenance being received by her under Section 125.
Since counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is not working anywhere, despite being a qualified Doctor, I consider that as she is receiving maintenance from husband, the Court should not allow her experience and qualification to go waste. I consider that she should be directed to work as a honorary Doctor in some public welfare institute or school free of charges where she can take care of health of the poor people. Let her come to Court and give an undertaking that she was prepared to work without charging anything in any institution named by this Court around her house minimum 5 hours a day and 6 days a week, so long she receives maintenance from her husband on the plea of being unemployed.“
11. Vikas Jain vs Smt. Deepali @ Ayushi Jain
Uttarakhand High court, (CR) 88/2002
https://www.shoneekapoor.com/vikas-jain-vs-smt-deepali-ayushi-jain/
12. Wife is working. So, No maintenance to her
MANISH KUMAR vs Mrs. Pratibha, 18-Sept-2008
http://www.the-laws.com/Encyclopedia/Browse/Case?CaseId=108002237200
https://www.shoneekapoor.com/manish-kumar-vs-mrs-pratibha/
13. Maintenance to wife and no maintenance. maintenance allowance cannot be granted to every wife who is neglected by her husband
Manmohan Singh vs Smt. Mahindra Kaur on 25 March, 1976
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1461900/
14. Madras High court: Wife is living separately and asking for maintenance, while she deserted
Manokaran @ Ramamoorthy vs M. Devaki on 21 February, 2003
Equivalent citations: AIR 2003 Mad 212, I (2003) DMC 799, (2003) 1 MLJ 752
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/54216
15. Section 3- Person can’t go behind bar
Mr Francis Cyril D Cunha vs Smt Lidiya Janet D Cunha on 8 July, 2015
Karnataka High court, 18-Dec-2015
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/57449739/
16. Well qualified but non-working wife
Rajat Gupta vs Rupali Gupta on 15 May, 2018
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/193567322/
17. Wife can’t file multiple cases for maintenance under section 125 as well as DV
Rachna Kathuria vs Ramesh Kathuria on 30 August, 2010
+ Crl.M.C.No. 130/2010 & Crl.M.A.No. 504/2010
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/113760308/
18. Wife filed 40k maintenance. Also asked for revision of maintenance
Ritula Singh vs Lt.Col. Rajeshwar Singh on 26 February, 2010
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1551300/
19. Unemployed man can’t be forced to pay
Sanjay Bhardwaj & Ors. vs The State & Anr. on 27 August, 2010
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/157955715/
The main article about session by Roopenshu Pratap Singh could be found here